The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FireArms, et cetera > Rifles and Muzzleloaders
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - .223 Deer Loads
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

.223 Deer Loads

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Adobe Walls View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField


Joined: 09 August 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 373
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Adobe Walls Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: .223 Deer Loads
    Posted: 31 October 2005 at 10:11
Have both 60 grain Hornady's and some 64 grain PowerPoints that I'd like to try for deer loads in a little Sako bolt gun. Have some Reloader 15 that I hear is good for heavy bullet loads in .223. Anyone out there got some suggestions?AW
Back to Top
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TasunkaWitko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2005 at 10:15


i was just thinking that it has been a while since
we've had a good flame war here at BSB.......

the 64 grainers should perform well, although you
might consider something tougher such as a
partition which will guarantee penetration. make
sure that the twist rate is appropriate for heavy
bullets, or they won't stabilize well.
TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
Rob1 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The Walnut Whisperer **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 3413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rob1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2005 at 10:52
 I think that caliber is illegal in many states for hunting, but I wouldn't say it wouldn't work on deer at close ranges. I wouldn't use anything but a premium along the lines of a X bullet myself. It certainly can be flame war material It's one of those situations where the question of why comes into question. It can me a mild load for a youngster but then youngsters aren't the best shots in field situations with all the excitement. A shot that might take out both lungs can easily be a shot that smacks a shoulder making a bloody mess but not a good kill.   I'd definately be looking for a super tough bullet and I'm not real sure how many are out there in that caliber, I've never really looked.
last in line for the nobel peace prize. first in line for pie

Charter Member of the Round Earth Society
Back to Top
waksupi View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Keeper of the Old Traditions

Joined: 11 June 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 2371
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote waksupi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2005 at 11:12
Ain't no way in hell I would use a .223 on deer.
Shooters Cast Bullet Alumnus
http://www.castboolits.gunloads.com/index.php?
Back to Top
EDip View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
Avatar

Joined: 12 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 562
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote EDip Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 October 2005 at 11:13

What's this word "flame"? The 22 centerfires and any centerfire which includes the 17's can be legally used here in Mich for deer in the rifle areas. As I recall youse Montanians can even use the 223 for elk. Back in '73 one of our young MT guide assistances used a 223. He was a trapper on the side. There's an old story I once read about how the gamewardens in MT were so impressed with the havoc generated on an elk by a 220 Swift, that 22 centerfires been been legal since. I'd use my 220 on deer here, but have better choices. FWIW.

Gene Dip(aka "Big Dipper")

Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 01:23
In reality, a .22 rf can kill just about anything on the planet, so .22 centefires are certainly up to it in competant hands. I don't subscribe to .22 centerfires for use on deer sized or larger game, but, that is me. As long as the shooter is up to it, the .22 center fires can get it done..............Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
dakotasin View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
a TRUE brother-in-arms!

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dakotasin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 02:08

i wouldn't use a 223 on deer. i have too many other rifles suited better for the job. the question rob asks -'why' - is a good one.

story time: last year i was babysitting an area, just watching deer. i watched a small buck come down a trail and right to a hunter sitting on a knoll, maybe 60 yard shot. the hunter took the neck shot. i watched as the deer dropped. a minute later, when the hunter went to claim his deer, the deer jumped up, and took off right towards me, and angled down into some real thick-n'-nasty cattails. hunter asks me if i saw his deer... i find out he's shooting a 223 because it doesn't tear up any meat, and he takes neck shots so he won't loose any meat.

i told him where his deer went, and watched him go in there. 5 (!!!) shots later he had his deer. went down to check out his prize, and the deer was just riddled w/ holes. at least he got it. i wonder, though... does that single hole i put through a deer w/ a bigger gun in the ribs destroy as much meat as a half dozen 223 shots scattered over the body?

i'm not disputing a 223's ability to (eventually) take a deer... but w/ the same payoff (dead deer), and much higher risks, why do it?

Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 02:28
My question exactly, "Why?". Lord help anyone if the "recoil" subject pops up...................................Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
Adobe Walls View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField


Joined: 09 August 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 373
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Adobe Walls Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 02:46

The .223 is getting some mileage here in Missouri these days, but usually in the hands of beginning hunters. The disaster stories that acompany the cartridge do surface from time to time. I think the road to disaster with this cartridge is paved first by the advisory adults that don't select decent or even reasonable bullets for anything bigger than coyotes. Usually off the shelf whatever's handy ammo. The next ingredient is the shooting ability and/or fire discipline of the shooter. I've heard of some lightning bolt kills with the .223 and do believe it. Short range and excellent shot placement usually are the deciding factor. As for my dabbling with the round, I figured that working up a top end load that would do for deer in a pinch would be a good thing. Anything will kill coyotes so why not use a "marginal" deer load in the little Sako for a do-all?

I tried some of the 60 grain Hornady bullets over a moderate charge of H335 and the 200 yard groups were very promising. I think the twist rate must be sufficient for 60's at least. I've heard that there may be better powder choices than H335 for bullets in the 60-64 grain range. I recall that Winchester did get some press several years ago when the 64 grain Premium? Supreme? .223 load came out, and that it was positive. Supposed to be a fair "Texas" whitetail load. Our deer here in the lower half of Missouri don't average all that much heavier, so I figured to give it a whirl and have the little Sako as a backup deer rifle if ever needed.AW 

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 03:36

I think the 223 can kill deer with the proper shot placement.  I've got better rifles so I'll probably not use it. 

My own thinking would be to use the heaviest bullet available, and then reduce the velocity to minimize any expansion.  If I used it I would hunt it like a bow, looking for double lung shot with perfect placement.

BEAR

Back to Top
Moose6 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Knoxville NASCAR Nut

Joined: 25 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2191
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Moose6 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 05:56

Hey KP... it kicks less

I know a guy in TX that has used a Ruger in .223 forever.  It has a Leupold scope on it that is so old that it is purple instead of black.  He uses the 63 gr. Sierra exclusivly with great success.

My father has used a 53 gr. X-bullet out of a .22-250 for doe hunts that also worked well.

Y'all shoot straight!!!

Moose - Knoxville, TN
Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 08:24
LOL, what was that I said about competancy? Along those lines, I stand around 5'7" and carry a full dress .45 ACP on a regular basis. I have noticed lately, that a lot of big guys who carry, prefer small framed handguns, that don't even fit their hands, yet they carry extra mags that I KNOW they can't change because their hand covers the mag port. Probably a better question left for the pistol room, but I mentioned it because my thinking tells me that big guys carry a lot of those .22 center fires for deer. I hear more horror stories connected with those calibers than I hear good stories with them on big game. Not that I wouldn't or haven't used a .223 on deer with success but, I would never claim it to be a true deer rifle. I guess it may sound like I am trying to start a war over this, but I am not. I also never said that I know better. My preferances run toward anything that you load powder with a shovel. My preferances are what is important to ME. Anyone can use what they want. Bow hunters flick boogers at cross bow hunters. Rem drivers flick boogers at savage drivers, and on and on. I have an all but new .30/.378 that is itching to shoot a deer and at this moment, that's what is really important to me. Who knows, I may break out that vatmint rig that I built last year (in .223) and use it, but, I highly doubt if I will drag an 18# rifle around for a deer. Just kidding, I won't. Just a mention though, I finally got that rifle working. It shot a .287 group yesterday at 200 yds. The problem I was having with it was with the mexican match I  whipped up for it. Now, with Win cases, rem benchrest primers, vita vhouri, and molly coated 66 gr speers, it's a screamer and I am ready for another match. GEEZE!!!! Who put the quarter in the hillbilly? Sorry for the long rambler guys..............................Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 10:18

What was that??????

 

Did I see a booger go flying by???????

 

BEARLOL

Back to Top
Gunrunner View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** Forest Grump **

Joined: 05 July 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1970
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gunrunner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 10:26

What's 'Mexican Match'? 

I'll put in another quarter.  

Somebody better call the Secret Service. Let 'em know there's an illegal alien in the White House...and it ain't the cook!!
Back to Top
Lawdog View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 278
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lawdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 10:38

".223 Deer Loads"

 

Easiest question ever to answer. None to be found. The .223, don’t care if it’s a Rem. or WSSM, isn’t suited for deer hunting. Even little deer. Lawdog

Back to Top
dakotasin View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
a TRUE brother-in-arms!

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dakotasin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 11:04

adobe- in the 223, i found varget and h-322 to be the best performing powder w/ bullets 60 grains or heavier.

this should not be misconstrued as an endorsement of the 223 for a deer rifle. in my own 223's w/ 60's and heavier, best accuracy comes from those two powders. varget works poorly w/ light bullets. h-322 works well, but is short on velocity.

Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 13:08
Mexican Match is when bullets are pulled from match ammo and tailored to suit ones needs. Obviously, they didn't suit mine, but now that heart breaker is a real screamer and a genuine precision paper puncher....................Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
drinksgin View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 17 October 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 218
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote drinksgin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 November 2005 at 13:27
I always thought you should determine small, medium and big men by their combined measurements, that is height and girth, I measure 113", shall not break it down, further, but my choices are .303 Savage with 200gr handloads at 2000fps, .35 Whelen with 214gr handloads at 2400 fps and .45-70 with 405gr handloads at 1800fps.
All moderate loads, but ones that go in a long ways and make a lot of hole.
I am sure my .243, the smallest thing I shoot, would do most anything with the proper bullet and velocity, but I just prefer things that make big holes even if they do not expand.
Don
Back to Top
Big John View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 229
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big John Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 November 2005 at 06:59

I guess I need to get my .02 in since the early 60's the .223 has been killing 150-280 lb men, Why not a 150-200lb deer? I have a NEF Altra hunter in .223 that is not only legal to use in NYS but also capable. Having said that I have elected to use my 30-06 for the first year (this year) that we are allowed to use rifles in the part of NY, not because the .223 won't work but because I want the range that my 30-06 affords me. Oh my wife will be hunting this year for the first time and she has a chioce of my SKS or her .223, Her choice.

 

Oh sorry got off track if she picks the .223 she has been shooting some 63 GR. sierra semi pointed rounds that is what I will be loading for her.



Edited by Big John
Back to Top
Lawdog View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 278
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lawdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 November 2005 at 09:35
Originally posted by Big John Big John wrote:

I guess I need to get my .02 in since the early 60's the .223 has been killing 150-280 lb men, Why not a 150-200lb deer?

 

Because compared to animals people die very easily. I have seen gunshot wounds that killed a 250 lb. man that wouldn’t have slowed down a 60 lb. Antelope. Lawdog

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.