![]() |
Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz! |
Wildcatting the Swede |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Guests
Guest
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Wildcatting the SwedePosted: 17 February 2006 at 00:34 |
|
I have an old Swede 6.5x55 with a broken stock and it's been sitting in the safe gathering dust and largely forgotten 'till I got thinking that I should do something with it. So my plan is to get a ramline stock for it (woodgrain not black) and fit a 3-9 scope on it. (It's already drilled and tapped with a bridge mount fitted.) Then I got thinking again (god, that hurts!) that I don't have a varmint rifle on hand (sorry guy's but the .270 ISN'T a varmint rifle) so what I'm gonna do is 'improve' the 6.5x55 by giving it a sharp shoulder and neck it down to .22. Now, I have absolutely no doubt that this has been done before a million times before but I think it would make a super little rig. Have you guys ever done, seen or read about anyone necking down the 6.5x55 to .22? If so I'd appreciate any tips or info. Cheers Russ. |
|
![]() |
|
saddlesore
.416 Rigby
Joined: 16 June 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1345 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 01:59 |
|
I wouldn't use a Ramline for anything. Too flimsy and too much forearm play. If you are going to build a rifle, select a better stock. The model 96 is suppose to be a fairly strong action, but I don't hot rod mine. I worry about there being no gas shroud on the bolt. If anything would happen, even a primer blown, all that gas is coming right back in your face. You also need to change the safety to get a scope to mount low enough, turn the bolt of it wasn't a carbine, probably put on a timney trigger. Probably wrap up about $400 in it. with a new barrel , etc. |
|
|
Saddlesore
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles |
|
![]() |
|
The_Mountaineer
.416 Rigby
** West BY-GOD Virginian! ** Joined: 02 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2653 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 07:40 |
|
Forget about going with 6.5 to a 22 conversion, rather go build yourself a 6.5 STW like Layne Simpson recommends Just kidding of course. I don't have my Cartridges of the World book in front of me so I can't check any references but I can't help but think that it would be 22-250 + performer. I'm sure somebody will be able to give some input. |
|
|
Paritur pax bello - Peace is obtained by war.
|
|
![]() |
|
dakotasin
Administrator
a TRUE brother-in-arms! Joined: 10 June 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4099 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 08:38 |
|
it would be awfully close to a 22 howell or 224 tth. i guess i wouldn't do it, but no reason you couldn't. looking at ballistics that will be likely in between the 22-250 and 220 swift. i guess if it were me, i would go ahead and blow the case out w/ a 40* angle and minimal taper (if that is possible... dunno how workable the brass is in the swede), and keep it in 264, or drop to a 6mm. Edited by dakotasin |
|
|
Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
|
|
![]() |
|
CB900F
Administrator
Honor, Integrity Joined: 10 June 2003 Location: Eritrea Status: Offline Points: 8857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 13:02 |
|
NOFX; I'm with Dakotasin in thinking I'd not go down to .22. I'd go ahead & A.I. it, let all that body taper open up for powder space. I doubt I'd try to increase the shoulder taper though, it's already steep enough & blowing the taper out is gonna pull enough out of the neck anyway, don't want to shorten the neck any more than absolutely necessary. If you use the same barrel, it's probably gonna have to have a one thread set-back, so be careful with the throat ream, it most likely won't be as long as the parent cartridge. Then, I'd just go to 6mm & stop there. 900F Edited by CB900F |
|
|
Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Dave Skinner
.416 Rigby
AKA "Fast Eddie" Joined: 13 June 2003 Location: Albania Status: Offline Points: 1693 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 15:29 |
|
Like Dak and CB say, I would not get too WILDcat with a 96 action. There's no gas management or a third lug.
I would go with a straight 243 and no hotter, or MAYBE a 257 bobster if you can get a short throat for the 75s. Get a decent barrel in a heavy sporter, and you will have a fine coyote and whistlepigger. CB might be all right in AI'ing the basic 6.5x55, because the changes to body taper tends to reduce bolt thrust a bit. But I don't think I'd build a 22250 on a 96. You could, but you'd not be able to zoom the cartridge. Don't push things too hard, that's all I can say. |
|
|
Up hills slow, down hills fast, tonnage first and safety last
|
|
![]() |
|
waksupi
.416 Rigby
aka Keeper of the Old Traditions Joined: 11 June 2003 Status: Offline Points: 2371 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 05:05 |
|
I'd leave it in the original chambering, and shoot light bullets. You can crank the 6.5X55 right up there. P.O. Ackley would wildcat anything. And he said, the Swede is perfect as-is, and cannot benefit by improving the shoulder.
|
|
|
Shooters Cast Bullet Alumnus
http://www.castboolits.gunloads.com/index.php? |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 06:23 |
|
Have you thought of trying the 90 grain .264 in the Swed? You already have a great cartridge. If the barrel shoots well, the 6.5 is a good varmint cartridge, certainly in the class with the 243. BEAR |
|
![]() |
|
North Logan
.416 Rigby
aka The Legendary Lawman Joined: 10 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 06:30 |
|
I agree, I'd look for a replacement stock & leave it just as is. Personally, I don't think there's anything wrong with a Ramline replacement stock if you can't find a wood stock. I put a Ramline on a Rem 788 as a replacement & the rifle is a sub 1" shooter with no other mods. Up here in Canada take off military wood stocks for Swede M 96's & M 38's can usually be had quite reasonable at gunshows. There's even the odd sporter stock that shows up as well. I just picked up the bottom stock in the following picture for $45 Canadian up here. It's a M 96 stock that has been shortened, slimmed & swivel studs added. Will take any Model 96 action with straight or turned bolt as a 'drop-in'.
Regards, Marcus.
Edited by North Logan |
|
"COLTS & PONY CARS"...
|
|
![]() |
|
saddlesore
.416 Rigby
Joined: 16 June 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1345 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 06:49 |
|
Re ligter bullets inthe 6.5. It has been my experience that the as chambered 6.5 swedes don't like anything less than 140 gr bullets. due to the long throat. Could be just my rifle though.
|
|
|
Saddlesore
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles |
|
![]() |
|
North Logan
.416 Rigby
aka The Legendary Lawman Joined: 10 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1728 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 12:29 |
|
Here's two spare Swede sporter stocks that I have acquired. Both are reconfigured military wood. Top one is the M96 sporter stock in the pic above. The bottom one is a M38 stock. Shortened a bit but not much else done. Sanded down & just needs an oil finish rubbed into it & maybe some QD swivels added. Figure I will run across a couple of Swede96/38 barrelled actions in need of stocks sooner or later & I will be away to the races so to speak. Barrelled Swede 96/38 actions can usually be had at gunshows up here in the $100 - $150 Canadian range...
Regards, Marcus.
|
|
"COLTS & PONY CARS"...
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Guest
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2006 at 01:20 |
|
Thanks for the reply guys. You know, I might just fit a stock and leave it as is. I will try the 85 grainer's and if they shoot good well I suppose I've got what I wanted. I'll check some reloading manuals and see how fast I can send the 85 grainer's and see how flat they shoot and if it all looks good, well, you guys just might have convinced me. |
|
![]() |
|
HondoJohn6508
.243 Winchester
Joined: 23 March 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 150 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 February 2006 at 17:25 |
|
NOFX, Well, I have to agree and disagree with some of the above posts. MOST cartridges will benefit from the Ackley reduced body taper and the 40 degree shoulder. Please note I said "MOST". "Papa" Ackley never AI'd the 6.5x55 Swede. That particular job was left to Bob Jourdan, a scribe for "Precision Shooting" magazine. The 6.5x55 Arch was the cartridge reviewed in his books. Most cartridges based on the .308 Winchester, ie .243, .260 and 7mm-08 will not see great velocity gains as compared to factory ammo. What you will realize from the AI treatment is longer case life and "greatly reduced" bolt thrust. The 6.5x55 BJAI (Bob Jourdan Ackley Improved) will exhibit all the attributes of the AI cartridge. A 95-100gr bullet at around 3400fps at a pressure level of 58-60,000psia is certainly workable in the Swede action but I wouldn't push it any higher than that. Slow powders like RL-22 or equivelent should work well with the Swede Improved. If you don't have P O Ackley's "Handbook for Shooters & Reloaders Vols I & II", you might search thru abebooks.com and find used copies. See Vol I for his treatise on the 30-30AI in the 1894 Winchester and his findings on observed bolt thrust difference between the standard 30-30 cartridge and the AI version. Whether or not to go the Ackley Improved route is a choice that only you can make. My personal criteria and suggestion to others has been if you plan to shoot more than 100 rounds a year...then it may be advisable from a cost standpoint. Hornady makes a "generic" neck sizing die for the 6.5 calibers and then all you need is a seating die for the AI version. If you intend to use the factory barrel you might want to try the Nosler 95gr V-Max bullet as it is the longest bullet available in the 100gr or less catagory and seat it out as far as possible(.020 into the case has worked for me in the military barrels.) Out of a 24" barrel, 3300fps is attainable at reasonable pressures using slow burning powders...ie H4350 and VV 150. By all means use a chronograph and pay attention to the standard pressure signs if you don't have access to the pressure strain gauges and software sold by RSI. Is it worth the hassle of going to the AI versions?.....well "yes" for me! But I am a 6.5 and Ackley Improved ardent proponent with the guidelines as outlined above. There is no general agreement between folks of good intentions on any subject. Best you get all the information available and then you be the judge. Thats the way it should be. Ol' John
PS .260 Rem, 6.5-08 AI, 6.5x55, 6.5x55 BJAI Edited by HondoJohn6508 |
|
|
Life Member - NRA - TSRA
Custom Riflesmith-Bolts & Levers only Mark Twain was right -- "There ain't no such thing as too much good whiskey!" Left-Hand Creek Rifles Castell, Texas |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |