NH;

Ruger makes a dedicated .22 rimfire semi-auto with the grip angle of the 1911.  I think it's called a 22/45 or something like that.  In any case it's the proven Ruger MKII action on a polymer frame with different ergonomics than the standard MKII. 

It doesn't matter that its grip is the same as the 1911 pattern pistols, since the 1911's can be had in 9mm, .40, or .45.  Or other variants such as the .400 Cor-Bon, .357 SIG, or who knows what else.  You'll be able to find something to like regardless of whether or not the .45ACP appeals to you or not.

Or go completely off the rails & get a Browning Buckmark.

900F

Nothing wrong with the guns you are looking at but if you are looking for something accurate the P-22 isn't it. I've shot a bunch of P-22 and owned a P-40 for awhile but dumped it because of the poor accuracy. I've been looking at the Sig pretty hard myself and will probably get one. The thing is for the price of either of those you could have a Ruger and nearly a case of ammo (5000) rounds. I think you'd be quite a pistol shot after burning through all of that. I own a 50th Aniv. and have had at least 7 other MK's all have worked real good.

DD

I picked up a buck mark last year on clearance.

Killed a good number of squirrels with it.

Wish I could have found a K22... nice.

Spot

NH;

You are making a LARGE generalization, regarding the hand fit of a 1911 pattern .45.  There are many variables possible with a 1911 frame.  Flat backstrap or the A-1 style, more grips available than you'd believe, beavertail styles, etc, etc.  Fat grips, thin grips, smooth grips, skateboard tape, anything.

900F

NH,  if possible have an experienced pistol shooter watch you while shooting.  It might take just a suggestion or two on your shooting form to get you hitting the bullseye.  Of course, a lot of practice will pay off in the long run. 

As far as 22's, the Single-Six is a good one and can be had at a low price.  I haven't shot the 22/45 but like the looks of the grip and magazine release compared to my MkII.  You might run across a used 22 in nice shape at a good price.  Handle as many as you can to see what feels good in your hands.

On the Colt jamming.  That might have been your grip on the gun that caused it, not the gun itself. 

I have a Ruger 22-45. I really like it. Very seldom ever jams, and accuracy is more than acceptable. It has a 4 inch barrel and that makes it easier to carry. I have shot many a sharptail grouse with it during elk season. And like you said the price is right on ammo. Mine works just fine on the $9.00 for 550 rounds stuff from Wal mart.

Wing master

i have yet to hear anything positive about the sig mosquito, which pains me because i like sig as much as i like remington.

the 22-45 is an option, though i absolutely hated the way it felt in my hand - didn't feel like a 1911 to me... just felt chintzy.

other options.... the browning buckmark and beretta neos have developed good reputations. if i were in the market, i'd get serious about the browning...

tikka... if you haven't heard anyone mention beretta it is because you have selective hearing!

i did mention beretta neos... still, i think browning makes the better pistol, though the neos can be had for less money, which probably makes beretta the better value...

Fella's;

I've heard of the NEOS, but haven't shot one.  Most of what I did hear was shortly after the release & was negative.  The concerns centered around lack of accuracy & jamming. 

I'd presume that from Dakota's comment, that things have changed.  Where would updated info be available?  Anybody here have first-hand info?

900F

 Yep they are uoogly for sure and nice colors. Guy had one at the range no problems but uoogly. DK my wife says that too,you and her in kahoots. 

Here's my pick.

i think he was referring to the peter (beretta).

tikka - its ok... my wife says i'm just deaf unless the words 'gun, deer, hunting, scope' are mentioned.

I have a Ruger 22/45. I don't really care for the polymer grip, and it doesn't feel like a 1911 to me. But it does shoot. I have a Red Dot on mine, and it is easy to keep it on my gong at 100 yards from a rest.

I do agree about the training. Sign up for a CCW, or some similar class. I took combat pistol training from an old FBI instructor. He said the biggest problem with trying to teach men to shoot, is that all men THINK they know how to shoot a pistol, so fight against the instruction. He said he can take a woman with no experience, and have her outshooting a man in a weeks time. I saw this happen.  

When I took the training, I had shot probably a hundred thousand rounds through pistols over the years, and had taken a fair amount of game. After going through the training course, my acuracy and technique was very much improved. I got further training from the local police department instructors. And if I find anyone else who is a real gunslinger, I will listen to what they have to say, also.

Kingpin wrote: Ray, I want to ask you something that is slightly off topic. I work with a lady, who is in the Navy and, by coincidence, from Alaska. I posed a question to her as to what handgun you locals carry when venturing into the woods. Her answer was exactly what I was thinking, when she said, a .357. I asked her about larger revolvers and she said that some carry them, but that they are quite heavy when carrying other things that one may need. What is your opinion, as mine is a .357 as is hers. Just a little off topic as you can see............................Kingpin

Those that live in the 'North' & carry handguns for 'bear' protection also recommend you file the front site down flush. That way it doesn't hurt as much when.... [edit]... you can guess the rest...

Regards, Marcus.

Anyway... back on topic... I've been toying with the idea of getting a target type .22 pistol for 'plinking'... been really considering a Ruger 22/45 since the grip angle patterned after the 1911. I do have a .22 Conversion Unit that I have already dedicated to a 1911 frame that goes to the range with me on nearly every trip. Guess I'd have to say for me it would either be a Ruger 22/45 5 1/2'" or a Mk II 5 1/2" bull barrel. That unless I could find a 'deal' on a S&W Model 41 or an older High Standard .22 target pistol.

I do have a little Beretta Model 71 .22 lr that is also a lot of fun to shoot but is not really a 'target' pistol...

Regards, Marcus.

What do you think about High Standard? I have shot a few and kinda like them. Course, I dont mind buying a used gun.

Wing master

I've got  HS Military version with target sights and a bull barrel.  bought it new in 1967.  Still a great shooter.

Gunrunner, I got two clips with mine.  I used one clip for years and after 20 years had the same trouble with it stovepiping.  I found that a slight pressure on the front edge of the magazine lips (tenderly) making them bend tight fixes it in 2 seconds.  Just push it against a soft pine board, it will not even scratch the bluing.  That fix seems to have fixed it for the last 18 years.  Good luck with yours.

BEAR

Do what I do -- visit your local pawn shop and make friends with the owner.  Ask him in a postive way, "You charge $10 to handle an out-of-state transfer, right?"

Then find the pistol you want on the internet -- http://www.gunsamerica.com - www.gunsamerica.com is a good source.

I have a Colt Officers Model Target (top-of-the-line target revolver in the 1930s), a Colt Service Ace conversion kit for my M1911s, and a lot of other guns bought used and cheap that way.

In semi auto I like the older High Standards.  I have a Supermatic Tournament with a 7 1/4" & 5.5"  bbls and they are wonderful to shoot.  If you have basic gunsmithing ability adding barrels is pretty easy.

Mitchells is manufacturing their version of the High Standards but I've heard mixed reviews regarding acuracy & reliability

For revolver I think it's hard to beat an S & W 17, 6" bbl or Colt Diamondback 6"bbl.  The Colt is a bit scarce & barrel heavy, but I like the sight picture with a squared off front sight.