8mm magnum vs .325 wsm
Printed From: The BaitShop
Category: FireArms, et cetera
Forum Name: Rifles and Muzzleloaders
Forum Description: Rimfire, centerfire, front-stuffer, whatever! Also, for more great firearms and reloading discussion, check out www.handloadersbench.com!
URL: http://www.baitshopboyz.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21705
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 21:10 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: 8mm magnum vs .325 wsm
Posted By: Irish Bird Dog
Subject: 8mm magnum vs .325 wsm
Date Posted: 02 September 2011 at 16:59
Just to throw out the one 8mm Magnum around.....really BIG case compared to the .325 WSM...see them both here.....
The 8mm Remington Magnum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rim_%28firearms%29" title="Rim firearms - belted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifle" title="Rifle - rifle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_%28firearms%29" title="Cartridge firearms - cartridge was introduced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Arms_Company" title="Remington Arms Company" class="mw-redirect - Remington Arms Company in 1978 as a new chambering for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_700" title="Remington 700" class="mw-redirect - model 700 BDL rifle. The 8 mm Remington Magnum's parent case is the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.375_H%26H_Magnum" title=".375 H&H Magnum" class="mw-redirect - .375 H&H Magnum . It is a very long and powerful cartridge that cannot be used in standard length actions, such as those that accommodate the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.30-06_Springfield" title=".30-06 Springfield - .30-06 Springfield . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8mm_Remington_Magnum#cite_note-accurate-2 - [3]
|
Contents
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8mm_Remington_Magnum#" class="internal" id="togglelink - show ]
|
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=1" title="Edit section: Background - edit ] Background
The 8 mm Remington Magnum was intended to compete with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Weatherby_Magnum" title=".300 Weatherby Magnum - .300 Weatherby Magnum and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.338_Winchester_Magnum" title=".338 Winchester Magnum - .338 Winchester Magnum . Remington’s decision to use a metric bullet may have been prompted by their past success with the 7 mm bore diameter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8mm_Remington_Magnum#cite_note-accurate-2 - [3]
Even though the 8 mm Remington Magnum has never been very popular, it
is a very suitable cartridge for the hunting of elk, moose, caribou,
and larger African antelope. However, the .338 Winchester Magnum had a
30 year http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_start_%28positioning%29" title="Head start positioning - head start
on the market, and is short enough for medium length actions, which
increases the models of rifles it could be produced in. It is also
available with heavier bullets, although this isn't a problem for people
that load their own rounds of this caliber. Bullet selection is quite
critical with the 8mm Remington Magnum since the bullets have to be
designed and constructed to hold together at magnum velocities. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8mm_Remington_Magnum#cite_note-3 - [4]
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=2" title="Edit section: Cartridge dimensions - edit ] Cartridge dimensions
The 8mm Remington Magnum has 6.43 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litre" title="Litre - ml (99 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grain_%28measure%29" title="Grain measure" class="mw-redirect - grain ) H2O cartridge case capacity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:8_mm_Remington_Magnum.svg" class="image">
8mm Remington Magnum maximum C.I.P. cartridge dimensions. All sizes in millimetres (mm).
Americans would define the shoulder angle at alpha/2 = 25 degrees. The common http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling" title="Rifling - rifling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twist_rate" title="Twist rate" class="mw-redirect - twist rate for this cartridge is 254 mm (1 in 10 in), 6 grooves, Ø lands = 8.00 mm, Ø grooves = 8.20 mm, land width = 3.10 mm and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percussion_cap" title="Percussion cap - primer type is large rifle magnum.
According to the official http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.I.P." title="C.I.P." class="mw-redirect - C.I.P. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_Internationale_Permanente_pour_l%27Epreuve_des_Armes_%C3%A0_Feu_Portatives" title="Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives - Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives )
guidelines the 8mm Remington Magnum case can handle up to 460 MPa
(66717 psi) piezo pressure. This is a very high maximum chamber pressure
limit for a rifle cartridge and ≈ 2.6 % above the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAMI" title="SAAMI" class="mw-redirect - SAAMI maximum piezo pressure rating of 448 MPa (65000 psi). In C.I.P. regulated countries every rifle cartridge combo has to be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_%28firearms%29" title="Proof firearms" class="mw-redirect - proofed at 125% of this maximum C.I.P. pressure to certify for sale to consumers.
The German http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_x_68_S" title="8 x 68 S" class="mw-redirect - 8 x 68 S cartridge introduced in 1939 is probably the closest ballistic twin of the 8 mm Remington Magnum. The 8 x 68 S is however a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rim_%28firearms%29" title="Rim firearms - rebated rim cartridge.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=3" title="Edit section: The 8mm Remington Magnum in field use - edit ] The 8mm Remington Magnum in field use
The 8 mm Remington Magnum as a pure civil cartridge can be used in
countries which ban civil use of former or current military ammunition.
A powerful cartridge like the 8 mm Remington Magnum has its
drawbacks. Like every other big game cartridge it presents a stout
recoil. Since there are not many factory loads available, the 8 mm
Remington Magnum is often used by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reload" title="Reload - reloaders . They can use this cartridge to create powerful loads by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handloading" title="Handloading - handloading ,
while staying within the 448 MPa (65000 psi) SAAMI piezo pressure
limit. Combined with bullets with jackets designed for magnum cartridge
muzzle velocities, and barrels of 650 mm (25.6 in) or longer to promote
high muzzle velocities, the 8 mm Remington Magnum offers the flattest
trajectory and best long range performance of the commercially available
8 mm rifle cartridges.
From 8 mm caliber upwards the rise of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sectional_density" title="Sectional density - sectional density
and penetrating capability of practical spin stabilized rifle bullets
(bullets up to 5 to 5.5 calibers in length) tends to flatten out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8mm_Remington_Magnum#cite_note-4 - [5]
This means that loaded with light, short and soft nosed 8 mm bullets
the 8 mm Remington Magnum can be used on remarkably small game. Loaded
with heavy, long and hard (solid copper) bullets the 8 mm Remington
Magnum offers enough velocity derived power to penetrate heavy and
dangerous game. The 8 mm Remington Magnum is suitable for hunting almost
any http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_animal" title="Game animal" class="mw-redirect - game animal on the planet, though certain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africa" title="Sub-Saharan Africa - sub-Saharan Africa countries have a 9.53 mm (.375 in) or 10.2 mm (.40 in) minimum caliber rule for hunting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_game" title="Big Five game - Big Five game - i.e. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard" title="Leopard - leopard , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion" title="Lion - lion , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_buffalo" title="Cape buffalo" class="mw-redirect - cape buffalo , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinoceros" title="Rhinoceros - rhinoceros and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_elephant" title="African elephant - African elephant . In the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_African_Republic" title="Central African Republic - Central African Republic , where there are no http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammunition" title="Ammunition - ammunition limits for hunting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_game" title="Big Five game - Big Five game , the 8 mm Remington Magnum’s somewhat smaller sister cartridge the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_x_68_S" title="8 x 68 S" class="mw-redirect - 8 x 68 S
is used successfully for hunting African elephant. At equal chamber
pressure and 650 mm (25.6 in) barrel length the larger 8 mm Remington
Magnum produces 3 to 5 % extra muzzle velocity.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=4" title="Edit section: 8mm cartridges compared - edit ] 8mm cartridges compared
Maximum muzzle velocity comparison in % of the probably most
proliferated European and American 8 mm rifle cartridges out of 650 mm
(25.59 in) long barrels loaded with relatively light to heavy 8 mm
bullets to their http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.I.P." title="C.I.P." class="mw-redirect - C.I.P. or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAMI" title="SAAMI" class="mw-redirect - SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute) sanctioned maximum pressures.
| Bullet weight gram (grain) |
8.23 g (127 gr) |
9.72 g (150 gr) |
11.34 g (175 gr) |
12.96 g (200 gr) |
14.26 g (220 gr) |
Case capacity (%) |
| 7.92 x 57 Mauser (8 x 57 IS) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| 8 x 64 S |
102.7 |
102.7 |
102.8 |
102.9 |
102.9 |
110.3 |
| .325 WSM |
108.7 |
109.1 |
109.0 |
109.3 |
111.1 |
131.7 |
| 8 x 68 S |
108.4 |
108.5 |
108.7 |
110.5 |
112.3 |
136.5 |
| 8 mm Rem. Mag. |
111.9 |
112.3 |
114.5 |
115.3 |
116.0 |
157.1 |
This comparison is not totally objective since the 8 mm Remington Magnum and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.325_WSM" title=".325 WSM" class="mw-redirect - .325 WSM operate at 448.16 MPa (65000 psi), the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_x_68_S" title="8 x 68 S" class="mw-redirect - 8 x 68 S at 440 MPa (63817 psi), the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_x_64_S" title="8 x 64 S" class="mw-redirect - 8 x 64 S at 405 MPa (58740 psi) and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.92_x_57_mm_Mauser" title="7.92 x 57 mm Mauser" class="mw-redirect - 7.92 x 57 mm Mauser at 390 MPa (56564 psi) maximum chamber pressure. Higher chamber pressure results in higher muzzle velocities.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=5" title="Edit section: The 8mm Remington Magnum as parent case - edit ] The 8mm Remington Magnum as parent case
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=6" title="Edit section: 7mm STW Shooting Times Westerner - edit ] 7mm STW (Shooting Times Westerner)
The 8 mm Remington Magnum case has functioned as the parent case for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7mm_Shooting_Times_Westerner" title="7mm Shooting Times Westerner - 7mm STW ,
which is essentially a 7mm (.284 caliber) necked-down version of the
8 mm Remington Magnum. Designed by Layne Simpson, Editor of shooting
Times magazine, the wildcat status of the 7mm STW ended in 1996 when it
got http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAMI" title="SAAMI" class="mw-redirect - SAAMI
certified and became an officially registered and sanctioned member of
the 8 mm Remington Magnum "family" of magnum rifle cartridges. With top
handloads pushing a 150 grain bullet at nearly 3,400 feet per second, it
is one of the fastest mid-bore rifle cartridges extant and is noted for
its extremely flat trajectory. It is outclassed only by the Lazzeroni
7.21 Firebird and Remington's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7mm_Remington_Ultra_Magnum" title="7mm Remington Ultra Magnum - 7mm RUM
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=7" title="Edit section: .416 Remington Magnum - edit ] .416 Remington Magnum
The 8 mm Remington Magnum case also has functioned as the parent case for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.416_Remington_Magnum" title=".416 Remington Magnum - .416 Remington Magnum ,
which is a .416" caliber necked up version of the 8 mm Remington
Magnum. Unlike the 7 mm STW, the .416 Remington Magnum never had a
wildcat status. It was designed by Remington and released directly to
the public in 1988.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=8" title="Edit section: Wildcats - edit ] Wildcats
Cartridges that are not officially registered with nor sanctioned by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.I.P." title="C.I.P." class="mw-redirect - C.I.P. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_Internationale_Permanente_pour_l%27Epreuve_des_Armes_%C3%A0_Feu_Portatives" title="Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives - Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives ) or its American equivalent, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAMI" title="SAAMI" class="mw-redirect - SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute) are generally known as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcat_cartridge" title="Wildcat cartridge - wildcats .
By blowing out standard factory cases the wildcatter generally hopes to
gain extra muzzle velocity by increasing the case capacity of the
factory parent cartridge case by a few percent. Practically there can be
some muzzle velocity gained by this method, but the measured results
between parent cartridges and their 'improved' wildcat offspring is
often marginal. Besides changing the shape and internal volume of the
parent cartridge case, wildcatters also can change the original caliber.
A reason to change the original caliber can be to comply with a minimal
permitted caliber or bullet weight for the legal hunting of certain
species of game.
Wildcats are not governed by C.I.P. or SAAMI rules so wildcatters can
capitalize the achievable high operating pressures. Because the 8 mm
Remington Magnum offers an exceptional sturdy, pressure resistant
cartridge case that can relatively easily be reloaded with primers,
powder and bullets and hence be reused several times it has become quite
popular amongst wildcatters. With the 8 mm Remington Magnum as the
parent case wildcatters have created 6.35 mm (0.257 in) (.257 STW),
6.5 mm (0.264 in) (6.5 mm STW), .30 caliber (.30–8 mm Remington Magnum,
.300 Jarrett), 8 mm caliber (8 mm Jarrett), .338 caliber (.338 Jarrett),
0.358 in caliber (.358 STA) and 9.53 mm (0.375 in) (.375 JRS [John R.
Sundra]) variants.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8mm_Remington_Magnum&action=edit§ion=9" title="Edit section: .358 STA Shooting Times Alaskan - edit ] .358 STA (Shooting Times Alaskan)
Another brainchild of Layne Simpson, the .358 STA is an 8 mm
Remington Magnum case necked up to accept .358 Caliber bullets with no
other changes. Able to propel a 300 grain bullet at over 2700 feet per
second for 4,900 ft./lbs. of energy, the .358 STA is a formidable big
game cartridge. It has never emerged as a production cartridge and has
had very limited success as a wildcat, overshadowed by the more popular
.375 caliber commercial and custom cartridges.
.325 Winchester Short Magnum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| .325 Winchester Short Magnum |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WSMandWSSM.jpg" class="image">
WSM and WSSM family of cartridges. From left to right: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.223_WSSM" title=".223 WSSM" class="mw-redirect - .223 WSSM , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.243_WSSM" title=".243 WSSM" class="mw-redirect - .243 WSSM , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.25_WSSM" title=".25 WSSM" class="mw-redirect - .25 WSSM , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.270_WSM" title=".270 WSM" class="mw-redirect - .270 WSM , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_mm_WSM" title="7 mm WSM" class="mw-redirect - 7 mm WSM , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_WSM" title=".300 WSM" class="mw-redirect - .300 WSM , .325 WSM. |
| Type |
Rifle |
| Place of origin |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States" title="United States - United States |
| Service history |
| In service |
Never issued |
| Production history |
| Designer |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Repeating_Arms_Company" title="Winchester Repeating Arms Company - Winchester |
| Designed |
2005 |
| Manufacturer |
Winchester |
| Produced |
2005–present |
| Specifications |
| Parent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casing_%28ammunition%29" title="Casing ammunition" class="mw-redirect - case |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Winchester_Short_Magnum" title=".300 Winchester Short Magnum - .300 Winchester Short Magnum |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet" title="Bullet - Bullet diameter |
.323 in (8.2 mm) |
| Neck diameter |
.350 in (8.9 mm) |
| Shoulder diameter |
.538 in (13.7 mm) |
| Base diameter |
.555 in (14.1 mm) |
| Rim diameter |
.535 in (13.6 mm) |
| Case length |
2.100 in (53.3 mm) |
| Overall length |
2.860 in (72.6 mm) |
| Case capacity |
83 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grain_%28measure%29" title="Grain measure" class="mw-redirect - gr H2O (5.395 cm³) |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling" title="Rifling - rifling twist |
1 in 10 in (254 mm) |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percussion_cap" title="Percussion cap - Primer type |
Large rifle magnum |
| Maximum pressure |
65,000 psi (450 MPa) |
| Ballistic performance |
| Bullet weight/type |
Velocity |
Energy |
| 180 gr (12 g) Ballistic Silvertip |
3,060 ft/s (930 m/s) |
3,743 ft·lbf (5,075 J) |
| 200 gr (13 g) AccuBond CT |
2,950 ft/s (900 m/s) |
3,866 ft·lbf (5,242 J) |
| 220 gr (14 g) Power-Point |
2,840 ft/s (870 m/s) |
3,941 ft·lbf (5,343 J) |
Test barrel length: 24 in (610 mm)
Source(s): http://www.winchester.com/products/catalog/rifle.aspx" class="external text" rel="nofollow - Winchester Ammunition |
.325 Winchester Short Magnum (also known as .325 WSM) is an 8 mm (.323 in) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliber" title="Caliber - caliber http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rim_%28firearms%29" title="Rim firearms - rebated rim bottlenecked http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centerfire" title="Centerfire" class="mw-redirect - centerfire short http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnum" title="Magnum - magnum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_%28firearms%29" title="Cartridge firearms - cartridge that was introduced in 2005 by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Repeating_Arms_Company" title="Winchester Repeating Arms Company - Winchester . It is a member of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Short_Magnum" title="Winchester Short Magnum - Winchester Short Magnum family of rifle cartridges.
The .325 Winchester Short Magnum was designed to take on the
thick-skinned and heavy-shouldered big game animals found from Alaska to
Africa. Combining the velocity of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Winchester_Magnum" title=".300 Winchester Magnum - .300 Winchester Magnum with the knockdown power of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.338_Winchester_Magnum" title=".338 Winchester Magnum - .338 Winchester Magnum , the .325 Winchester Short Magnum offers the power needed to take on big game animals in a lighter short action rifle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum#cite_note-0 - [1]
Like all .300, 8 mm and .338-caliber magnum cartridges the .325
Winchester Short Magnum cannot be universally used on African game since
certain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Saharan_Africa" title="Sub-Saharan Africa - sub-Saharan Africa countries have a 9.53 mm (.375 in) minimum caliber rule for hunting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_game" title="Big Five game - Big Five game .
|
Contents
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum#" class="internal" id="togglelink - show ]
|
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum&action=edit§ion=1" title="Edit section: Cartridge dimensions - edit ] Cartridge dimensions
The .325 Winchester Short Magnum has 5.39 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litre" title="Litre - ml (83 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grain_%28measure%29" title="Grain measure" class="mw-redirect - grain ) H2O cartridge case capacity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:.325_WSM_cartridge.svg" class="image">
.325 Winchester Short Magnum maximum cartridge dimensions. All sizes in millimetres (mm).
Americans would define the shoulder angle at alpha/2 = 35 degrees. The common http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifling" title="Rifling - rifling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twist_rate" title="Twist rate" class="mw-redirect - twist rate for this cartridge is 254 mm (1 in 10 in), 6 grooves, Ø lands = 8.00 mm, Ø grooves = 8.20 mm, land width = 3.10 mm and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percussion_cap" title="Percussion cap - primer type is large rifle magnum.
According to the official http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.I.P." title="C.I.P." class="mw-redirect - C.I.P. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_Internationale_Permanente_pour_l%27Epreuve_des_Armes_%C3%A0_Feu_Portatives" title="Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives - Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives )
guidelines the Winchester Short Magnum family of rifle cartridges can
handle up to 445 MPa (64,542 psi) piezo pressure. In CIP regulated
countries every rifle cartridge combo has to be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_%28firearms%29" title="Proof firearms" class="mw-redirect - proofed at 125% of this maximum CIP pressure to certify for sale to consumers.
The .325 Winchester Short Magnum is a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_L_problem" title="Delta L problem - Delta L problem cartridge, meaning it can present unexpected chambering and/or feeding problems. The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_L_problem" title="Delta L problem - Delta L problem article explains this problem in more detail.
The German http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x68mm_S" title="8x68mm S" class="mw-redirect - 8x68mm S
cartridge introduced in 1939 is probably the closest ballistic twin of
the .325 Winchester Short Magnum. The .325 Winchester Short Magnum is
considerably shorter and fatter and has a more radical rebated rim, much
steeper shoulder angle and a shorter neck (7.82 mm) than the 8x68mm S.
This makes the 8x68mm S case with its 9.11 mm long neck better suited
for loading long heavier bullets and due to its sleeker exterior shape
bound to cycle more reliably in bolt action rifles in extreme
situations. On the other hand the proportions of .325 Winchester Short
Magnum promote good internal ballistic efficiency that allows the .325
Winchester Short Magnum to fire shorter lighter bullets at slightly
higher muzzle velocities whilst using less propellant than the
classically proportioned 8x68mm S.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum&action=edit§ion=2" title="Edit section: 8 mm cartridges compared - edit ] 8 mm cartridges compared
Maximum muzzle velocity comparison in % of the probably most
proliferated European and American 8 mm rifle cartridges out of 650 mm
(25.59 in) long barrels loaded with relatively light to heavy 8 mm
bullets to their http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIP" title="CIP - CIP or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAMI" title="SAAMI" class="mw-redirect - SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute) sanctioned maximum pressures.
| Bullet weight gram (grain) |
8.23 g (127 gr) |
9.72 g (150 gr) |
11.34 g (175 gr) |
12.96 g (200 gr) |
14.26 g (220 gr) |
Case capacity (%) |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x57mm_IS" title="8x57mm IS" class="mw-redirect - 8x57mm IS (7.92x57mm) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x64mm_S" title="8x64mm S" class="mw-redirect - 8x64mm S |
102.7 |
102.7 |
102.8 |
102.9 |
102.9 |
110.3 |
| .325 WSM |
108.7 |
109.1 |
109.0 |
109.3 |
111.1 |
131.7 |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x68mm_S" title="8x68mm S" class="mw-redirect - 8x68mm S |
108.4 |
108.5 |
108.7 |
110.5 |
112.3 |
136.5 |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_mm_Remington_Magnum" title="8 mm Remington Magnum" class="mw-redirect - 8 mm Rem. Mag. |
111.9 |
112.3 |
114.5 |
115.3 |
116.0 |
157.1 |
This comparison is not totally objective since the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_mm_Remington_Magnum" title="8 mm Remington Magnum" class="mw-redirect - 8 mm Remington Magnum and .325 Winchester Short Magnum operate at 445 MPa (65,000 psi), the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x68mm_S" title="8x68mm S" class="mw-redirect - 8x68mm S at 440 MPa (63,817 psi), the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x64mm_S" title="8x64mm S" class="mw-redirect - 8x64mm S at 405 MPa (58,740 psi) and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8x57mm_IS" title="8x57mm IS" class="mw-redirect - 8x57mm IS at 390 MPa (56,564 psi) maximum chamber pressure. Higher chamber pressure results in higher muzzle velocities.
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum&action=edit§ion=3" title="Edit section: See also - edit ] See also
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchester_Short_Magnum" title="Winchester Short Magnum - Winchester Short Magnum
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_handgun_cartridges" title="List of handgun cartridges - List of handgun cartridges
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rifle_cartridges" title="List of rifle cartridges - List of rifle cartridges
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_mm_caliber" title="8 mm caliber - 8 mm caliber
[ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum&action=edit§ion=4" title="Edit section: References - edit ] References
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.325_Winchester_Short_Magnum#cite_ref-0 - ^ http://www.reloadersnest.com/frontpage.asp?CaliberID=404" class="external text" rel="nofollow - .325 WSM at www.reloadersnest.com
- http://www.reloadbench.com/cartspec.html" class="external text" rel="nofollow - .325 WSM dimensional drawing at www.reloadbench.com
- C.I.P. CD-ROM edition 2003
- C.I.P. decisions, texts and tables ( http://www.cip-bp.org/index.php?id=tdcc-telechargement" class="external text" rel="nofollow - free current C.I.P. CD-ROM version download (ZIP and RAR format) )
------------- Irish Bird Dog
NRA Life/Endowment
2nd Amendment Supporter
|
Replies:
Posted By: klallen
Date Posted: 02 September 2011 at 18:19
|
nice synopsis, ibd. yeah, the .325wsm certainly is not an equal to the 8mmremmag.
in a way, i think that's what helped the .300, 7mm and .270 wsm's. they had a valid comparison to recognizable cartridges ... the .300winmag, 7mmremmag and .270wbymag. folks knew these things and the wsm's could stack up very favorably to them.
then came the .325 and what do ya have. the much larger 8mmremmag. no meaningful comparison of equality there. be like saying the .358norma's the equal to my .358sta.
the 8x68s (a great one in its own right) is indeed a more appropriate cartridge to use for comparison sake, but wager the results would be disappointing to poll the general shooting public and see how many of them even know what the 8x69s is.
more and more, it seems like if you see a .325 comparison, it's being made to the .338winmag and maybe that's more correct.?.?.?.? who knows.
good stuff, though.
k
------------- A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!
The Duke
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 03 September 2011 at 00:36
|
sort of got to take a look at the 8x57 loadings used in the comparison. Most are loaded to old Mauser action standards. I load the 8x57 and it can be loaded close to the 325. But the 325 does kick like heck? But the 325 I shoot is in a light weigh Kimber, and that has a definite effect on recoil.
Personally, I like the 8x57 better than the 325; but the downside is the 8x57 will be on a long action but it feeds better.
|
Posted By: RobertMT
Date Posted: 03 September 2011 at 10:39
|
I think it depends on what you want the cartridge for, I choose the 270wsm, because I wanted the reach of the 300wm, without the recoil and because it was something different. The 270wsm is compared to 270wby, it's not, it's a step between 270 and 270wby.
I never bought into the idea of saving a couple of ounces, by going wsm vs longaction.
As far as 325wsm, I think it would fall neatly between 8mm/06 and 8mag.
------------- Want to stop Drunk Drivers, from Killing Sober Drivers? Ban Sober Drivers from Driving. That's how Gun Control Works.
NRA Benefactor Life, GOA Patriot, SAF
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 03 September 2011 at 13:54
|
Fella's;
When the .325 was introduced, Winchester tried to trumpet that it was the equal to the .338 Winchester magnum on a short action. It didn't take a rocket scientist (obviously 'cause I'm not one) to do some comparisons between what Winnie published for the .325 & various reloading manuals published for the .338 to determine that somebody in New Haven wuz smokin' dope.
Since I've got a .338, I quickly lost interest, and haven't regained it.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: Kingpin
Date Posted: 03 September 2011 at 14:53
|
Any of that tripe about short fat cartridges equaling the time tested cartridges that have been used for years is just that, tripe. Gun writers, as I have said in the past, are whores to rifle companies and will give glowing testimonies about a pile of dung, as long as it's shown to them first. Along these lines, let's compare a couple more cartridges. Let's take the .458 win mag and compare it to say, a 105 howitzer. It makes just as much sense as comparing the .375 H&H to the .375 winchester or the .375 ruger. It can't be done because they aren't even in the same class. On recoil, all recoil is relative. Perhaps the making and naming of alphabet cartridges is aimed at cream puff shoulders. I am kind of short, but I have large shoulders. Both of them have been repaired with rotator cuff surgery. I shoot my .300 WinMag, my .30/378/ my .416 Rigby, my .338 Lapua, my .470 double, and my McMillan .50 BMG regularly. I know they have recoil, I expect them to have recoil, and I am not disappointed. Recoil would never steer my thinking. Incidentally, I own several .22 rf's and they too are a joy to shoot. Going to a local range to shoot any of my .30 cals is a trip of endurance. I usually shoot about 200 rounds minimum. Recoil is a sensitive subject with me. Personally I don't mind it. Some do and that's ok too. As far as short fat cartridges go, I believe that they are much a do about nothing. I don't think they are close to legendary or will ever make it. I have always believed that accuracy and terminal energy are what puts supper on the table. Carrying over distance isn't bad either..................................Kingpin
I edited terminal velocity to terminal energy, sorry for the mix up.
------------- There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
Posted By: klallen
Date Posted: 03 September 2011 at 16:22
|
i've never really understood why folks get all worked up about certain cartridges. new cartridges. wsm's in this particular case. the promotion and press surrounding them, for sure. it can go way over the top. but that's a people thing, not a cartridge thing. the cartridges themselves ... they're simply options.
i've been working with a howa 1500 .375 ruger for the last couple weeks. so far, i like the cartridge. not because it's a .375 H&H (although it's 260 gr. accubond at just over 2900 fps aint to shabby), but because it's a .375 ruger. it grabbed my interest and got me working with the .375 class when no other cartridge in the class did.
regarding the .325wsm, who knows. i've zero idea what to expect from this thing. all i know is of all the short magnum offerings available to this point, this is the one that's interested me the most. the .300 and 7mm's would have been overshadowed by things already in the safe. and i'd already screwed around with a .270 that i really didn't want so a .270wsm wasn't desireable. and so the right rifle at the right price happened to come along and presto. i'm playing with the 8mm class. if i can rustle up 2900 fps (+/-) behind a 200 gr. accubond that will print well on target, i'll be satisfied.
as to recoil, my attitude about it has kind of morphed over the years. any more, i tend to keep it all very simple. if i want to work with a cartridge who's recoil i find less then appealing ... i fix it. period.
this string's taken on lots of topics. i like.
k
------------- A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!
The Duke
|
Posted By: Kingpin
Date Posted: 04 September 2011 at 07:50
I guess it did get crazy. Is there anyone here who has an 8MM Mag? I know Rob does but when last I remember, he was having trouble with it. I don't think he ever finished telling us all the skinny. I seem to emember vaguely that he was swapping barrels and had shortcomings from PacNor. Let's liven this up............Kingpin
------------- There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
Posted By: Rob1
Date Posted: 04 September 2011 at 08:14
A Krieger barrel finally solved my 8mag woes. I then promptly sold it. Anymore, ballistics are at the bottom of the list when choosing a cartridge for a rifle.
------------- last in line for the nobel peace prize. first in line for pie
Charter Member of the Round Earth Society
|
Posted By: klallen
Date Posted: 05 September 2011 at 03:34
|
CB900F wrote:
When the .325 was introduced, Winchester tried to trumpet that it was the equal to the .338 Winchester magnum on a short action. It didn't take a rocket scientist (obviously 'cause I'm not one) to do some comparisons between what Winnie published for the .325 & various reloading manuals published for the .338 to determine that somebody in New Haven wuz smokin' dope. |
- .325 - 180 bt (.394bc) - 73.0 grs. - 3153 fps - 3972# me
- .338 - 180 bt (.372bc) - 76.0 grs. - 3281 fps - 4301# me
- .325 - 200 ab (.450bc) - 69.0 grs. - 2964 fps - 3900# me
- .338 - 200 ab (.414bc) - 76.0 grs. - 3020 fps - 4049# me
snagged these out of my latest nosler. they're the bullets i'll be using in the .325 so figured that'd be the data i'll gleen from. these are just straight, top end, printed loads. kinda interesting that they did their load development on a 26" wiseman for the .325 wsm and a 24" wiseman for the .338 win mag. you'd think the longer barrel would help the .338 much more then it would the .325.?.?.?.? strange how they choose some of the development components that they do.
anyway, i'm in complete agreement with cb. the .325 is not a .338. if real life mimics printed data, you can see this. however, it must be said, if i went hunting with cb and we were after game he felt required a .338 win mag, i'd feel just as comfortable hunting that same game (and expect similar, if not the same, results) using a .325 wsm.
course, there's always that arguement with the .338 that you can push it into an area the .325 can not go by using 250 gr. bullets. probably a valid arguement. trying to use real heavy bullets in a .325 wsm would only less the powder capacity by the depth you'd have to seat them to still function in a short action magazine. but i'd counter, if you needed a 250 gr. in a .338 win mag, i'd need my .358 sta and it's 280 gr. bullet. lol. there's benefits to having several things in the safe.
later, all
k
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 05 September 2011 at 12:07
|
Klallen;
When I finally got a load developed for my .338WM, it was this: Win brass, CCI lg rifle magnum primer, 75.5 grs of RL19 and a Hornady 225 grain spire point, BC at .397, part #3320. It ran 2870 fps & gave me excellent accuracy for years. The 6th edition of Hornady, book 2, gives me a muzzle energy figure right at 4000 ft lbs.
All of a sudden it went overpressure & I'm still trying to get that situation figured out & under control. Unfortunately, it occurred more than once when trying to get a handle on the solution. So, it wasn't an isolated event, which wouldn't matter if it was, once is one too many times.
But, back to the point, I didn't figure any of the newer .338 calliber offerings could come close to what was available with the Winchester magnum.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: klallen
Date Posted: 05 September 2011 at 12:57
|
hi, cb.
if i can get that velocity, and some accuracy, behind these 200 accubonds, i'll be thrilled. should be able to reach out a little bit and touch something with that .450 bc, too.
hope you get your pressure issues figured out. hunting season's just around the corner.
k
------------- A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!
The Duke
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 05 September 2011 at 14:04
|
Klallen;
Not to worry, the .338 won't be in the field this year, but I've got other arrows in the quiver.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 15 May 2020 at 16:59
|
Dang this is an old post. I ran across it on a Google search. I read every word too... I vote for the 8mm Rem Mag. 
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: MapleHill
Date Posted: 15 May 2020 at 17:57
|
The WSM have some merit, but alot of it is marketing. How close to the original do you need to be to justify even having it? All the hype was about the short action weight savings, less recoil. My question is, how much? How much weight are you really saving to ditch your old 300Win mag and buy a brand new 300WSM? And how much less recoil, honestly with all things being equal, the laws of physics are pretty clear, 180gr bullet at 2900fps, produces X amount of reactionary force, doesn't matter if it's in a short fat case or a long belted case. If there is a difference I would suspect it is hardly noticeable to Joe average, my guess would be you would need a lab and some expensive test equipment to tell the difference. In the case of the 325/8mmRM the original is substantially bigger. The 8mm Mag is based on the magnum length action, 300/375H&H/300Wby. The others, 270Wby, 7mmRM/7mmWby/300Win mag are a standard long action length case. This would mean the 270, 7mm and 300WSM are closer in case capacity to the originals. I have held off from the Short magnum craze, I do think they are great performing rounds, but I'm not buying the hype the manufacturers pushed that they are so much better than the originals.
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 07:20
|
Well, interesting because it was a 9 year old post. some positive talk on the WSM series of cartridges.
With 100% hindsight, the WSMs are dead. didn't seem to offer much to shooters. But the promoter made millions on license to Winchester and others.
Regarding recoil, I always laughed as they said, higher velocity, reduced recoil and in a lighter short action. Just can't happen on this planet.
I still reload for my neuphew's 325 WSM. He is 42 but finds the recoil 'too much'. So I load it to 8x57 velocities, and he loves it.
We all know that powder capacity is a "diminishing returns" event. 10% powder increase gives you a 4% velocity increase.
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: MapleHill
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 07:38
|
It does seem the WSM have fizzled out Bear. I am not saying they didn't get the job done, but are they enough better to buy a new rifle? Now for us gun nuts, it doesn't take much to have the urge to buy a new rifle, but for the average hunter that doesn't buy into all the hype...I have heard/read brass didn't last all that long and the sharp shoulder angle made for troublesome feeding...again no first hand knowledge just reading. But the feeding issue would make sense, i.e. Ackley Improved shoulder angle. It seems the shooting world is driven on the "next best thing" mentality. Which is fine, otherwise we'd all still be shooting a 30-30. But the marketing gets a bit out of hand if you stop and think about it for a minute...how can you kill a deer deader than dead??
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 07:58
|
30-30 still a great round.
Winchester never was good at two things, design and marketing.....maybe that is why it is out of business. Their bigest mistake was trying to market a series of WSM cartridges. The sizzle was spread between too many newbies.
the wise marketing would have been to just bring out the 270 WSM, as there is only one cartridge in that diameter to compete against. the 270 Win is about 100 years old, they could have sold agaainst that one.
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: MapleHill
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 09:51
|
Agree on all accounts. I love the 30-30. And the WSM always seemed to stump me. 270, 7mm and 300 then 325 all right about the same time. The 270 and 325 made the most sense. Not alot of players in the 270 or 8mm field. There seems to be a trillion 7mm and 308 choices out there. Now it seems the 6.5 is all the rage.
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 13:25
So to set this straight. 8mm good, even though it only works in the longest actions made and nobody has ever heard of it. WSM's bad, even though they fit in any action and do the exact same thing as the bigger vs's, but nobody feels the need for that. Did I get that right?
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: RaySendero
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 15:19
|
No jsg, I don't think so. I tend to think of step-ups in either cartridge power or the game I would hunt with them. As to power, I think a step up is either a 50% increase in bullet weigh (+ bigger diameter) or a 500 fps increase in velocity at the same bullet weight at same diameter. The Rem 8mm magnum achieves about a +500 fps in velocity over either the 8x57 or 30-06 with a 200 grain bullet. So I think Remington achieved a step up in power their 8mm Mag. The 325 WSM did not.
------------- Ray
|
Posted By: MapleHill
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 15:55
|
Nothing is "bad", the only thing I think is foolish is all the hype the manufacturers pump out about how much better the WSM are compared to the originals. I think the WSMs are fine, I don't have one, not saying I wouldn't, just don't believe they are any better than the originals I already have.
|
Posted By: Irish Bird Dog
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 19:12
The 2 CF cartridges I use most are the 7mm/08 & 30-06. Hard to improve 'nuff on either one. there is a 7mm Rem mag in same gun rack for the "JIC" scenerio.
------------- Irish Bird Dog
NRA Life/Endowment
2nd Amendment Supporter
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 19:51
YUP got it...
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 22:31
Honest, I get it.
So I take the 375 h&h and neck it down right? I'm gonna go down another rabbithole here. Same 375, straightened out, thickened head, steeper neck, then necked down? A 378-8mm!
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 22:32
I have two 375's, my mind wanders down many a rabbit hole and often.
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 16 May 2020 at 22:35
The WSM's are a great idea with a poor approach.
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 17 May 2020 at 05:55
|
got a 375, (2) 416, (2)338, 9.3
Some people like BIG guns. But I shoot my 22 rf and 222 very often also.
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 17 May 2020 at 08:07
|
Love big guns. BUT you just can't shoot 300 rounds all day at P dogs with a 416, just can't do it. They all have a place and nitch. 22 rim is what's needed for gophers, 223, 6mm, for P dogs. 308, 6.5's for deer. Yesterday we dusted off a couple hundred rounds at P dogs. Even at that the 22/250 and 243 we spent maybe $200 in ammo and $25 bucks in gas and maybe $100 in ware and tear on the truck. Just going with the 8 it would triple the cost of a day of fun...
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: MapleHill
Date Posted: 17 May 2020 at 08:15
|
They all have their niche. Some are a little tiny sliver of a niche, but it's there!
|
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 06:46
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 06:57
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 08:00
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 08:55
|
Well, in summary ( LOL on that), the 325 WSM is dead and well burried.
IBD's original post had a good comparison all to the honorable 8x57 Mauser.
The 325 WSM had an 8% velocity increase...not much. So what makes that increase?
Is it the short fat design the inventors cries about? NO Is it the marketing genius of Winchester? NO
Really simple the 8x57 is loaded to 56,000 pressure and the 325 is loaded to 65,000. More pressure, more velocity. Can the 8x57 just be loaded to 65,000, sure in a modern rifle. And it would surpass the 325.
Nothing new here, just playing with the numbers.
I ain't got no new fangled short fat cartridge!
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 09:10
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 09:16
|
A 200 gr Barnes in a Mauser runs about 2600 fps. A 200 gr Barnes in an 8mm rem mag runs 3100 fps And a 200 gr Barnes in a 325 MSW runs about 2900 fps.
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: Irish Bird Dog
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 09:46
The closest cartridge to a 8mm bore size I own is in a classic rifle...a M94 in .32 Spl.
------------- Irish Bird Dog
NRA Life/Endowment
2nd Amendment Supporter
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 02 August 2020 at 10:05
I have one of those! I used to have the old Mauser too. I miss it.
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 05:18
|
Winchester still offers the 325wsm in the XPR model.
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 06:18
|
Interesting to look at the XPR rifles. Made in Viana, Portugal They look like a browning X bolt. Neither Browning nor winchester make guns in the USA. Neither actually make any rifles, merely import branded products from overseas made by others. to bad, another loss of american made goods.
With Remington on the ropes, it looks like Ruger is going to be the only source for an american made turn bolt gun.
It does seem that foreign gun makers have the ability to market less popular cartridges, like the 325. Although sometimes, they list such items in their catalog but no models make it into import goods?
I doubt the 325 WSM has any following in Portugal or Europe.
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 07:36
|
HUMMM? Very interesting read,Vinootz.
The rifle I have never herd of but sounds cool. BUT I think I have to lean toward what I have. Rem 700, 8mm rem mag, I get little better performance then a 325. I do wish I had a 26" barrel on it.
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 08:17
|
i use to hunt with a guy that had a 300 AI with a 32 inch barrel. He liked it and said it gave him 150 FPS faster and less muzzle rise.
It was a SS tube and I could see it when he moved from 600 yards away. Might also reduce recoil.
Wonder why there are not more barrels over 24"?
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
Posted By: jsgbearpaws1
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 08:52
Vinootz wrote:
Winchester still offers the 325wsm in the XPR model. |
?They do? I thought they all disappeared!
I may have to fill a niche. The 8's have always been lacking in popularity. Never understood why either. Maybe that Winny made the 338 and had great marketing at the time it just got overlooked as a funky "Euro" style thing?
------------- ...oh yeah! thats gonna hurt!
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 03 August 2020 at 09:01
|
"Wonder why there are not more barrels over 24"?"
Back in the day It was the "IN" thing. People now still feel a hunting rifle needs to be 24". That and weight I would supposes. Most "NEW" rifles ordered new can be with 26" barrels.
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: Vinootz
Date Posted: 15 February 2026 at 16:45
|
.323 cartridges are growing on me. I want to invest in a quality 8x57. If I ever get a belted cartridge chambering I decided it will be an 8mm rem mag. I’ve been avoiding belted cartridges. This all developed ever since I bought two 325wsm rifles; and took up reloading. Plus I invested in expensive K&M mandrels for 8mm and .30calibers. Lol. I like the idea of the 8mm REM mag with the 150 grain bullets for 3400 fps velocities. Also, 8mm was one of the first calibers made in the 1800s. The Lebel by the French. I consider it the granddaddy of rifle cartridges. Shame it’s not more popular. 35 ft. Lbs of recoil ain’t all that bad. At the bench cushion up. Good stuff.
|
Posted By: d4570
Date Posted: 15 February 2026 at 18:45
We have an 8 RM a 8X57 and a 7X57, no 325wsm.The 8x57 is great, in my mind the 7x57 is Greater, but all Pale to the Big 8. I have no input on the wsm.
------------- Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
Posted By: BEAR
Date Posted: 16 February 2026 at 07:28
|
When I bought my double barrel rifle, I could have picked anything and the 4558 was enticing. But I picked 8x57 as more useable, works for deer and black bear.
------------- “ The IQ and the life expectancy of the average American recently passed each other in opposite directions.”
|
|