.45 acp choice??
Printed From: The BaitShop
Category: FireArms, et cetera
Forum Name: Handguns, Pistols and SixGuns
Forum Description: Also, check out www.sixguns.com!
URL: http://www.baitshopboyz.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=17281
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 21:10 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: .45 acp choice??
Posted By: BigAl4604
Subject: .45 acp choice??
Date Posted: 09 June 2009 at 16:35
Since I am tired of being called unamerican for not owning a 1911 but at the same time not wanting to spend $2500 for a custom wilson combat/nighthawk/les baer etc. I am looking at either a KIMBER PRO CDP II or a SPRINGFIELD LOADED CHAMPION. I don't believe I could go wrong with either but am looking for some input from you .45 acp guys. Being a HK/Glock guy I was curious as to the above pistols' reliability (I understand break in periods) more especially with hollow point ammo since I may decide to carry it on occassion.
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
------------- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759
|
Replies:
Posted By: RaySendero
Date Posted: 09 June 2009 at 23:50
Get the Kimber.
------------- Ray
|
Posted By: Montana Maddnes
Date Posted: 10 June 2009 at 02:56
|
Both are good pistols, but I would also go Kimber if they where the only two to choose from.
MM
------------- Montana Maddness
God Bless The U.S.A.
On the Highways for Jesus!
|
Posted By: BigAl4604
Date Posted: 10 June 2009 at 03:21
|
Thanks for the input. I know that these "modern" pistols are not your daddy's 1911 in that they have been "improved" in looks, accuracy, tolerances, etc., but they now have the option of shooting jhp ammo and that is where they get the hang ups. Glocks, HKs etc. (not as pretty and less expensive) dont' have that problem. In other words what does it take (Gun make/model, ammo type, parts, mags, break-in, tuning)to get one of these new 1911s to go bang every time with jhp ammo???
MM, do you have a preference that you deem more reliable than the two I have suggested???
------------- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759
|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 10 June 2009 at 03:57
|
I've owned many a 1911 including a CDPII, and I would go with the Springer, provided the Champion is not alloy. The CDPII is alloy, and cannot tolerate harsh treatment or use. My CDPII developed feed ramp scaring and rail wear on the frame. The corners of the magwell mouth also broke down during months of carry. It is a medium duty carry pistol, period. Very accurate, flashy-looking, would work well as a backup pistol. I am also not a fan of the Swartz safety, which Kimber uses on the II models.
That's my 2 cents.
------------- Mule
|
Posted By: Montana Maddnes
Date Posted: 10 June 2009 at 11:22
|
No not really I happen to shoot a Series 70 Stainless Colt. I really like it and it is accurate as hell.
My buddy Digger (that sold me the Colt to buy his Springfield) baught a Sprinfield Marine Corp Operator. WOW what a fine shooting 45acp! I don't know why I like the Kimbers better, I just do. I don't know that one would be better than the other. Just love the Kimbers in my hand.
MM
------------- Montana Maddness
God Bless The U.S.A.
On the Highways for Jesus!
|
Posted By: BigAl4604
Date Posted: 10 June 2009 at 12:13
|
Thanks again for all the help....
Mule, you are correct the champion is steel frame while the pro cdp is aluminum...never thought about it, but I will keep it in mind. I normally carry either Glock or HK so I probably won't carry the 1911 that much but again it is useful to keep it in mind.
------------- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759
|
Posted By: Kingpin
Date Posted: 12 August 2009 at 23:45
I am not a pusher of Kimber, but it's a personal thing with me. I never had much use for what they call, "custom fit." A blind guy on a pogo-stick could fit parts better. Personally, I like the springfield and the old Colts. The new SIG 1911 looks good, but I haven't tried them yet.....................Kingpin
------------- There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 13 August 2009 at 08:15
|
BigAl;
Why not get a .45ACP on a H&K platform? You get "the" American pistol cartridge and a platform you're used to. Best of both worlds seems to me.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 14 August 2009 at 07:37
|
Ok, if you want a kraut bastard of a pistol. I shot an HK at the range. Owned a Sig P220 for a while too. I reckin' I'm spoilt by 1911s. If you buy a HK, don't ever buy a 1911. You'll feel like you've wasted part of your life.
------------- Mule
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 14 August 2009 at 08:33
|
Mule;
Oooh, our skirts are showing!
As a matter of fact, I have both, & each has its place.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: Wing master
Date Posted: 14 August 2009 at 09:55
|
I have a Smith and wesson 1911. It has digested full metal jacket, and hollow points with no problems. in fact the only time it has had any problems at all was one time when I shot over 200 rounds without cleaning it. Then I wiped down the feed ramp with a solvent soaked rag and shot about 100 more rounds without a hang up.
I think that says alot about this gun. It is the one in the holster attached to my bed frame. That should say how much faith I have in this gun. and its loaded with Hornady XTP (jacketed hollowpoint)
Wing master
------------- I have always considered myself to be quite the bullshitter, But ocasionally it is nice to sit back and listen to a true professional......So, Carry on.
|
Posted By: BigAl4604
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 06:58
|
Wow, still getting opinions...good ones I might add and (un)fortunately I have taken them all and have done some horse trading ended up with a pretty good collection.
SPRINGFIELD- TRP and EMP .40
KIMBER - PRO CDP II AND ULTRA TACTICAL
HK - COMPACT .40 AND .45
Still kept a HK USP .40 and a Glock 19
------------- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
-Benjamin Franklin, 1759
|
Posted By: southern utah
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 07:39
|
springfield loaded, some models have a package with a deal on extras.
|
Posted By: Mickey Rat
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 09:57
|
At this point in time, most 1911's are pretty good. Taurus makes a nice one. Almost any non-military 1911 will shoot OK and be reliable.
I have a 1927 Argentina, an Essex frame race gun and Springfield 1911-A1 (stainless). All shoot well (better than me). What do I prefer? Whatever I have in my hand at the time. Spirngfield for carry, race for fun and the Argentina for nostalgia.
Even the lower priced ones work pretty well.
What is my daily carry piece? Kel-Tec 32 with a laser. I like the light weight (I work in shorts most days). Better a 32 in hand than a 45 in truck (that's where my 45 stays).
------------- Mickey Rat
Citizen of Alabama NRA Life Member
|
Posted By: carlo1776
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 10:15
|
I was fealing guilty as well not owning a 1911 so I ended up getting a Taurus PT1911. Lots of opinions back and forth but I found it to be a solid gun (all steel no alloy) with some great factory accurizing features. I still ended up replacing the hammer & sear, slide stop barrel bushing and thumb safety, but only because I was a little picky. It shoots great groups and I've cycled abot 3000 rounds through it without a stoppage. I also have a Para on order for Oct.
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 21:57
|
Fella's;
AND, I see that Para has moved out of Can-dania to South Carolina in the U.S.. Which, I suppose, could give a fella that'd not been any too enthusiastic about them a reason to obtain one. I did handle a Para light double action a few months ago that felt pretty good. Anybody got any real-world experience with one?
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: Irish Bird Dog
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 22:42
|
to jump into this thread.......I like 1911's! & have several.....One that I have is an older Springfield Armory 1911 (.45ACP) I bought used several yrs ago......it had been "worked on" some by a previous owner but not a pro 'smith. It came with a Colt bbl, long guide rod, shortened hammer spur, Pachymar rubber wrap-round grips. I added Bo-Mar rear adj sight & front sight to match for target shooting plus an ambi safety for my lefthandeness. Also replaced every spring in the gun and had a real 'smith do a minor trigger job ie: reshape the sear in a jig for proper fit etc to correct the bad job done by someone in the past. It has been very reliable and a fun gun to shoot. Mostly shoot 230gr rd nose cast bullets w/my bullseye load. 1911's.......yuh just gotta love 'em!
------------- Irish Bird Dog
NRA Life/Endowment
2nd Amendment Supporter
|
Posted By: Kingpin
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 01:50
CB, Todd Jarret handed me his personal Para DA, and I shot it for an afternoon. It handled very well and I liked it, but I don't want one. I own a Para P-14 steel framd that I built from their kit. I liked it a lot more. The trouble with double stack .45's is, the concealability factor is gone.......................Kingpin
------------- There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
Posted By: huntin1
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 08:04
|
I guess I'm one of them unamerican guys. I much prefer my West German Sig P220 to the 1911's. Not that the 1911's are bad I just prefer the Sig.
huntin1
------------- "Never corner something meaner than you"
|
Posted By: Kingpin
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 19:57
As long as you have one Huntin. I have a 220 too and like it a lot. I guess personal choice works. I don't think I ever saw a more reliable pistol than the SIG, in any caliber..........Kingpin
------------- There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
Posted By: huntin1
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 22:15
|
Actually have 2 Sig's, the 220,and a P229 in 40S&W. Prefer the 220 though. Carry it most often, even though the barrel is longer, it's more comfortable to carry. Maybe because of the single stack mag.
A buddy has a Gold Cup and a Kimber Custom II, they are both sweet shooters. I've shot them quite a few times, still prefer my 220.
But, if I could swing it I wouldn't mind having one of those Kimber Customs as well. 
huntin1
------------- "Never corner something meaner than you"
|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 25 August 2009 at 07:07
I bought a P14 for my son's first 1911. It had feed problems from the get go. Traded it in for a Kimber Custom II that he shoots really well. Soured me on Paras even though I know that any make can produce a lemon. I just don't get the Sig thing. They're wide, grips are weird feeling, and the DA/SA trigger...well, it just ain't natural.
------------- Mule
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 25 August 2009 at 19:44
|
I've always liked the S&W 1955 as my 45 ACP.
|
Posted By: klallen
Date Posted: 25 August 2009 at 20:35
|
i have the .45acp in a basic ria1911, a bersa thunder45 and a glock21. i like each but am not overly picky. if a handgun functions well and offers the accuracy needed for it's purpose, i can deal with pretty much anything.
some of these are more conducive to cc then the other but i wouldn't want to be a nasty feller looking to do harm an caught in front of either.
k
------------- A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!
The Duke
|
Posted By: C1PNR
Date Posted: 17 November 2009 at 05:02
|
BEAR wrote:
I've always liked the S&W 1955 as my 45 ACP. |
Yeah, but you're an anachronism. OK, I do like my 25-2, too.
If I were to buy a new to me 1911, I think I'd like to get the Kimber in 4", kind of like the old Commander. My Commander is the LW version in alloy frame, but without the Series 70 or 80 trigger abominations.
I will also admit that I really like the P14 Para Stainless I bought in '98 and had worked over. I especially like the tritium front sight. Not really a carry gun, unless conditions are REALLY right, but with a couple of extra magazines you're ready for a long night!
------------- Regards,
WE
|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 17 November 2009 at 06:23
Kinda late to the party C1, but no matter, always room for another 1911 post. I think I've got all the 1911s a man could want. My Commanche Length Les Baer gets the most carry. I'm most confident with it. Not sure why. I've got two Wilsons that are prettier, and a Colt that was overhauled by Wilson that is the most accurate one of the bunch. The Baer just seems to fit. A couple weeks ago my son and I were at the 100 yd range with the AR. He pulled his Colt Commander and popped of a few rounds at the sillouette target just for the hell of it. The first couple rounds kicked up dirt at the base of the target and he walked it up until he had three holes in the pecker area. I pulled the Baer, loaded with my special recipe for dirtbags, fired one round right through the head of the sillouette. I stopped right there.
------------- Mule
|
Posted By: tj3006
Date Posted: 24 November 2009 at 10:23
|
One thing to consider about the good old 45 Auto.
Good old hardball is still a prety decent stopper. I belive .68 stops with one torso hit.
I would prefer to carry hollow points but sometimes they can be hard to find...tj3006
------------- Freedom 1st tj3006
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 24 November 2009 at 10:37
|
I'm not a 45 auto guy. To big for CCW.
But younger brother won a "gun option" at a local sportmens club (actually his wife had the winning ticket).
He asked me what to get, as he didn't think he needed anything special. I told him to take the Kimber Gold match II; figuring as a NIB it would be an investment. Gun looks great and feels OK to me.

|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 25 November 2009 at 17:47
|
Guns are a sucker's investment. They're overpriced new, and it takes way too long for mass produced pieces to get back to their original market value, let alone surpass that value. No matter, you've got a good shooter there that will do surprisingly well as a CCW piece with the right holser. I like the Milt Sparks VM2. You can get one from this place http://www.topgunsupply.com/ - http://www.topgunsupply.com/ , and they will notify you when they're in stock. Much faster than having one built. After a month, you won't know you're carrying a big gun and no one else will either.
------------- Mule
|
Posted By: CB900F
Date Posted: 25 November 2009 at 21:49
|
Bear;
If he ever has the hankering to get rid of that Kimber, I'd be interested. If he weren't going to insist on full retail you understand.
900F
------------- Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
|
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 25 November 2009 at 22:44
|
He got the gun, and it will stay NIB. I told him to get something fast; because if the dealer (large one) goes bankrupt...he would be out the $1400 credit he had.
He wasn't looking for an investment, just a stabilization of his asset base. I felt the Kimber pistol will hold its value and easier to store than the Weatherby Mark V in 340.
It is a beautiful piece, outstanding grips and finish. My shooting group is mostly federal law enforcement types, and they are already to get one after seeing this. Must be a change after seeing so many Glocks???
But I will pass it along CB. And periodically remind him. Until he sees some thing he really likes/needs it is just relaxing in his safe ( not a high quality safe, just a Browning ).
|
Posted By: Muleskinner
Date Posted: 01 December 2009 at 06:52
|
340 Weatherby....Nice too.
Handguns always sell better than rifles, as high power long guns are of limited utility in many places.
------------- Mule
|
|