The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Hunting > Big Game
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - does speed kill?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

Topic Closeddoes speed kill?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Direct Link To This Post Topic: does speed kill?
    Posted: 09 August 2004 at 06:59
or just splatter?
TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
saddlesore View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby


Joined: 16 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1345
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 August 2004 at 07:12
Take a 3200 fps 180 gr 30 cal and compare it to a 400 gr, 1800 fps 45 cal bullet and you will find that at 100yds, the 45 will outperform every time. About the only thing speed gets you is getting the bullet there faster ,and a flatter trajectory.
Saddlesore
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
Back to Top
bkcorris View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka The Cheesehead Savage

Joined: 11 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2120
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 August 2004 at 09:08
I think a lot of it deals with what you consider your personal expectations for performance to be. If you want a bullet to hit lungs and create a huge shock that may likely drop them now then speed is key, if you want a relible shot anywhere, bone included then a slower or better built bullet is needed. Either way a well placed shot will bleed and kill whether it delivers 600 or 6000 fpe at either 1000 or 4000 fps. 

Stupid people are like a slinky, they don't serve much purpose in the world but they sure are fun to watch tumble down the stairs!
Back to Top
Triggerguard View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby

aka The San Antonio Terminator

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2212
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 August 2004 at 10:54
Penetration kills, speed just makes it easier to hit.
"...A moral compass needs a butt end.Whatever direction France is pointing-towards collaboration with Nazis, accomodation with communists,...we can go the other way with a quiet conscience"-O'Rourke
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2004 at 01:34

I much prefer the flexibility offered with higher velocity behind a hunting quality bullet.  >>  klallen

 

A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
Moose6 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Knoxville NASCAR Nut

Joined: 25 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2004 at 02:15
Spot.... well splatter is dead too right?
Y'all shoot straight!!!

Moose - Knoxville, TN
Back to Top
2Bits View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 10 August 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2004 at 14:24

Since I done said my howdy do's Mr. Administrator.....I'll tell you that yes, your darn tottin it does. I once took out two very nice bucks at the start of the season back in the blizzard of 76 come to think about the date. I hadn't set my sights on these critters as a real take home blessing but none the less the LORD does shine in mysterious ways.

I nailed both those bucks to the cross with speed to burn let me tell ya son! Why I hit one of em so hard it flew clean over top me and landed just like the butcher would get ready to carve up your ham on his table saw for ya, all laid out ready to skin. All total I guess I made out like a king with venison to go around for plenty that day. However, my truck doing 65 miles an hour did suffer a few dings and dents. Yup! I was eatin like a peasant on the kings deer.....which cost me a small fortune come time to pick up my truck.



Edited by 2Bits
Thank A Vet For Your Freedom!
Back to Top
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 August 2004 at 03:48

2bits -

welcome to the BaitShop! looking forward to your knowledge and experience here on BSB!

TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
2Bits View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 10 August 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 August 2004 at 18:04

Well Roy Weatherby used to dance with joy over his super sonic hypershock giving rifles he peddled to the folks that bit down hard on his claims.

However, I never chewed much of the fat he was offerin up back then. It usually caused more problems with those super sonic speeds he tried sending those bullets across at over canyons out in the West.

Now that was back then and now things has changed so's much, that sheep is starting to look very tolerable to all cattle men. Meaning you got so many more bullets to choose from and the marketing jestures taken these days would make W.C. Fields look like a kid in a candy store.

We got new this and new that, I reckon one might have to take a refresher course just to keep up with progress in the industry these days. However, I still remain true to my wife of 30 plus years and the guns in the rack. I don't mind a change or two ifin there is real need ya hear me, I just don't think that anything out there in the gun world is going to put an Old Timers 270 Winchester or 338/06 way back in the closet for keeps understand.

I am not going to mix words for or against the Ultra Mags or the Short Mags, nor I am going to chastise those that believe they have found the lost pearl of the Indian ocean either. I am a conservative type when it comes to rules, laws, voting and guns for the most part. I do like to make my own wildcat rifles and hunt em. It's a pleasurable thing for me since I can't dance.

I don't care to subscribe to a hunting or shooting magazine either anymore, on acount most is not fit for the younguns to read, with all the alcohol suggestions on every other page not to mention the Tabaco illustrations too. The story's are the same old hash that has been kicked around for the past 40 years, give or take and I have heard or read most of it now a bakers dozen.

The gun writers of today are affraid to really tell it like it is, cause it's all about money and promotions in the future. I am here to tell ya the best of them Boys is gone to the happy hunting grounds. So I just take things with a grain of salt and go about my business and what I really know has worked for me since the late 50's Gents.Bullet placement and penetration are the 2 key words to any hunters success in the wild.



Edited by 2Bits
Thank A Vet For Your Freedom!
Back to Top
Spot shooter View Drop Down
Left BSB in Disgrace
Left BSB in Disgrace

Banned

Joined: 19 June 2003
Location: Bahrain
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 00:25

Moose,

    I hadn't posted yet but yet splatter can kill.

But if you splatter enough you might not penetrate to the vitals with enought bullet.

   I've seen front leg's turnt to mush, and a shrapnel penetrates but not big holes.  It takes maturity to know your shot... (gun, abilities, distance in which you ran stay out of trouble) if your going to use a lighter round.  There are plenty of wild eye pistol wavers who aren't afraid of recoil, hell there are some guy's who live for it.  What I'm gettin' at here is bullets of mass take substancle amounts of fuel to get them moving where light weights don't... Awful tempting to stay light.

  Take the 7WSM for instance - theres a round that splatters but has enough mass to keep going.  If your using it on the 250 to 300 yd shots it's slowed down enough to do it's job.  If on the other hand yer using BT's and you shoot a deer at 25yds... and make contact above 3200 fps  SPLAT....   it'll kill it sure enough, and it'll put it down hard, BUT you have to eat around the hole.  This is why I went with the 300WSM and keep the top end around 3k and use solids.  However I may have gone too far with that seeing the two deer I hit with one shot is fairly "unethical"... That bullet needs to damn near stopped after Criter #1.  I bought some accu-bond's to see if I can build a load up for Elk. (I only want one of them at a time!)

    Anywho, Saddlesore is dead on with Mass....  it's a bit hard to quantify because the "hydro-dynamics" of the bullet pass through are of value in terms of putting the critter into shock.  BUT if you don't penetrate with mass that shock can mean very little fast.  

Spot

Back to Top
Moose6 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Knoxville NASCAR Nut

Joined: 25 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 00:47
Oh crap Spot.  I thought you started this post.  It showed up on a day when you started about 3 or 4 topics, so I thought this was yours.  Oh well, sorry Spot and Tas.
Y'all shoot straight!!!

Moose - Knoxville, TN
Back to Top
saddlesore View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby


Joined: 16 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1345
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 05:19

For elk, I tend to go with the heaviest bullet in the caliber I'm shooting.

For deer, I go a little lighter 165-180's in a 30 cal.

For sheep, goat and antelope , which are not hard to kill,I go with the 130-140 grains ina 6.5 or .270

Saddlesore
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
Back to Top
Vern Humphrey View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 29 November 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 12:29

I like Bigfoot Wallace -- a .35 Brown-Whelen.  I drive a 225 grain Nosler Partion Jacket an honest 2,800 fps.  It shoots flat enough, and penetrates like there's no tomorrow.

Rifle Magazine recently had an article on the 9.3 X 62 and 9.3 X64 -- the .35 Brown-Whelen is almost exactly the same cartridge, and it does all they claim for it.

Back to Top
SteelyEyes View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
Avatar

Joined: 21 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 879
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 13:42

Match the bullet construction to the velocity and the animal is dead meat, if you put it in the right spot.

Slow heavy bullets are cool in the brush. Not because they push twigs aside and keep on trucking (they don't) but because they're lethal as all get out in the ranges you'll see and shoot game. No blood trailing required and even if there is for a bit it'll be a huge swath you can follow at a trot.

However, my .300 wammo jammo wildcat magnum is just as lethal with a good controlled expansion bullet like a Nosler partition, Win. Failsafe, or something like that. I can take the same rifle and shoot a good distance if I have to (and the conditions allow it) and have a really good chance of doing an equally good job out there too.

So if you only hunt vine maple jungles on the Olympic penninsula or some place then a 30-06 with 200 grain bullets will do the trick just fine. If you only take 100 or 200 yard shots no matter the terrain that's also fine.

Honestly most rifles sold will do the job 90% of the time. I think people spend way too much time picking out little details that the deer or elk won't care about when they're hit with it.

Back to Top
Gunrunner View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** Forest Grump **

Joined: 05 July 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1970
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 15:03

I've been reading the replies on here since it first posted.  It has always seemed to me the only need for the extra speed is for long range shooting at game. 

If a 30-06 has been used for almost a century to take large game, why the need for a 300 Ultra Mag?  The only reason I can figure is to hit the game at a much longer range.  And way out there the same bullet will have the same velocity as a lesser powder charge cartridge at closer range. 

I think the Ultra Mags, Magnums, Short Magnums, etc, have their place if used in an accurate rifle by a skilled marksman.

Within reasonable distances that most hunters can accurately shoot, I'm not so sure they are needed.

As has been stated so many times on this forum, it is more of bullet placement and the type of bullet, rather than how fast the bullet can be driven. 

Having said all that, I have been kinda wanting a 300 WSM for some time now. 

Somebody better call the Secret Service. Let 'em know there's an illegal alien in the White House...and it ain't the cook!!
Back to Top
2Bits View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 10 August 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 15:32

Gunrunner......I am going to purchase a 300WSM this week as matter of fact for a project I am going to undertake. A wildcat it will be, however the .264 caliber bullet sitting on top the 300WSM case will do a lot for long range shooting and penetration as well, with a custom made 160 grain bullet.

The 140 grain bullet has a sectional density of .287 & BC of .490 which is good indeed. However the sectional denstiy of the 160 grn bullet will be .330plus and BC should be better than a .540, this is excellent for delivering energy down range for a long ways. I will shoot it from 500 to a 1000 yards at paper.

Thank A Vet For Your Freedom!
Back to Top
macca View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Thunder From DownUnder

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 August 2004 at 17:14

Accuracy kills.speed,frontal mass and penetration all help.I like the best of all worlds and a 338 lapua looks good.

Macca

don't let the bastards grind you down.

Back to Top
2Bits View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester


Joined: 10 August 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 August 2004 at 15:55

Macca.......It takes a long time to be the type of shooter that can print excellent groups at 1000 yard matches with a very well put together rifle!

The Lupua is a great round for sure, however it is way to much in recoil for anybody (around 55 pounds of felt recoil to the body without a brake on the rifle) not having a muzzle brake on the end of the barrel.

It is also very difficult to practice at the rifle range with a muzzle braked rifle..........people don't like them as a general rule.

I will need lots of practice time and this wildcat we are  going to put together will have the recoil of a 7mmmag or less. This means I only need a recoil pad to sit and fire a 100 rounds a sitting at the bench. 

Thank A Vet For Your Freedom!
Back to Top
SteelyEyes View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
Avatar

Joined: 21 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 879
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 August 2004 at 14:21
I guess it depends on the range you go to. The one I used to go to had a lot of braked rifles. I remember being at a bench and 5 of the 6 people on my end of the line had muzzle brakes. I'm sure I sprayed as much hot junk on them as they did on me.
Back to Top
macca View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Thunder From DownUnder

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 August 2004 at 20:55

The 338 lapua I used two weeks ago printed a 6.05 group from the bench at 1000 and a 60-60 possible prone this last weekend at 600 yards.It uses custom .621 BC projectiles at just over 3005fps from a 30 inch tube and only produces 36.63ft lbs of recoil at a recoil of 14.04fps.I don't use a brake in competition(not allowed down here).I don't find the recoil a major factor.Weighs in over 12lb.

I shoot a 6mm,308,223,300win and a 6.5-284 as well depending on what I get lent.My mate is a gunsmith and I use what I get loaned.

There are two 6.5-300WSM I have competed against and they go pretty well but not as well as the 7mmWSM which has taken a fair few comps this year.

I agree it does a lot of time to make a good LR shooter.My best group at 1000 is around 5.65.

Macca

don't let the bastards grind you down.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.235 seconds.